Author: U S Government Accountability Office (G

Publisher: BiblioGov

Published: 2013-06

Total Pages: 22

ISBN-13: 9781289113810

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) project to consolidate four terminal radar approach control (TRACON) facilities in the Los Angeles basin area by 1995, focusing on FAA plans to meet the automation needs of the Los Angeles basin area's terminal airspace. GAO found that: (1) the airspace in the Los Angeles basin area has experienced more near-midair collision reports than any other location in the United States; (2) the four TRACON facilities in the Los Angeles area had previously reported computer capacity shortfalls resulting in the loss of aircraft identification information from controllers' screens; (3) FAA reacted to those shortfalls with stopgap measures designed to keep current, aging systems operating; (4) the FAA plan for a consolidated facility did not allow for steep growth in air traffic and assumed that an advanced system would be implemented on schedule; and (5) due to its lack of a computer capacity and performance management program, FAA did not know if its automation plan for the consolidated facility would meet future needs.

Download or read book Air Traffic Control written by U S Government Accountability Office (G and published by BiblioGov. This book was released on 2013-06 with total page 22 pages. Available in PDF, EPUB and Kindle. Book excerpt: Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) project to consolidate four terminal radar approach control (TRACON) facilities in the Los Angeles basin area by 1995, focusing on FAA plans to meet the automation needs of the Los Angeles basin area's terminal airspace. GAO found that: (1) the airspace in the Los Angeles basin area has experienced more near-midair collision reports than any other location in the United States; (2) the four TRACON facilities in the Los Angeles area had previously reported computer capacity shortfalls resulting in the loss of aircraft identification information from controllers' screens; (3) FAA reacted to those shortfalls with stopgap measures designed to keep current, aging systems operating; (4) the FAA plan for a consolidated facility did not allow for steep growth in air traffic and assumed that an advanced system would be implemented on schedule; and (5) due to its lack of a computer capacity and performance management program, FAA did not know if its automation plan for the consolidated facility would meet future needs.